
Popularity: 100% [?]

Popularity: 100% [?]




(27 votes, average: 4.04 out of 5)Tags: Classic Rock · Music
| M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| « Aug | ||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 |
| 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 |
| 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 |
© 2008 culturegraph — Sitemap — Cutline by Chris Pearson
11 responses so far ↓
1 » strawberry fields, integration from 0 to infinity Aggregate Mad Blog: aggregates the interwebs // Mar 31, 2008 at 3:14 pm
[…] via | culturegraph […]
2 Kekoa // Mar 31, 2008 at 3:55 pm
I laughed for almost a minute straight when I first saw this. I hope that doesn’t mean I’m crazy.
I would definitely buy a shirt of this.
3 Stumbler // May 3, 2008 at 6:35 pm
I don’t get this…?
4 Troyka // May 3, 2008 at 8:47 pm
At the risk of being pedantic, I’d like to point out that this actually refers to the area UNDER strawberry fields, forever.
But Strawberry Fields Forever is still my favorite song.
5 Troyka // May 3, 2008 at 8:48 pm
And also, you forgot the “dx” after the integral.
6 Seannnnn // May 25, 2008 at 12:38 am
Stumbler fails, but it refers to the song “Strawberry Fields” by the Beatles. The specific lyrics being “Strawberry Fields forever”
7 Me // Jun 6, 2008 at 12:39 pm
“Strawberry fields under the scope of this function” doesn’t have the same ring to it, Troyka.
8 Area // Dec 8, 2008 at 4:12 pm
Actually Troyka, the integration is done over s ergo the ds in the end and not dx.
9 G // Dec 8, 2008 at 8:47 pm
Should have taken the limit as strawberry fields approach infinity.
10 illuminatiscott // Dec 8, 2008 at 9:24 pm
I think a better one would be
Lim (x->inf.)Strawberry Fields(x)
11 Pyotr // Dec 9, 2008 at 8:40 am
Troyka: or perhaps it should be dstrawberries?
Leave a Comment